From: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Przywara, Andre" <Andre.Przywara@amd.com>,
"Pohlack, Martin" <Martin.Pohlack@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:13:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110726181304.GD32536@aftab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E2F0068.1080001@redhat.com>
Hi Avi,
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:59:04PM -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > This change leaves virtual region address allocation on other families
> > and/or vendors unaffected.
> >
>
> Is it possible to derive the bit positions (and the need to mask them)
> from the cpuid description of the cache topology and sizes?
As far as I understand your question, there's no need for deriving the
bit positions because they're not special. You just have to have bits
[14:12] the same across all processes - we simply opted for clearing
them in order to keep the patch as simple as possible. But we could just
as well hashed the library name and generated the bits from it and thus
keep them same per library (we have that version too, btw. :)).
FWIW, in both cases, the patch should fix even the virtualization
scenario with and without KSM.
Does that answer your question?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-26 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-22 13:15 [PATCH] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 11:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 13:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 16:16 ` Andrew Morton
2011-07-26 18:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 17:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-24 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 18:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-24 19:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-24 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-25 20:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-25 21:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 5:58 ` Ray Lee
2011-07-26 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 18:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-26 19:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 17:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-28 14:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-28 14:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 17:59 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-26 18:13 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2011-07-26 18:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 18:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-26 18:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-26 19:42 ` Andre Przywara
2011-07-26 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-27 4:14 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 6:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 6:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-27 9:30 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:45 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 15:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-07-27 15:57 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-27 16:42 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110726181304.GD32536@aftab \
--to=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=Andre.Przywara@amd.com \
--cc=Martin.Pohlack@amd.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox