From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kyle Moffett <kyle@moffetthome.net>
Cc: kernelmail.jms@gmail.com, RKK <kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Fw: RCU boot debug patch
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:02:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110728000254.GB2318@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZ=bq+p0kNuj-2dAj40D1Hdru-S64vE_QEhL_mAphYY-0hqyw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 07:56:10PM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 17:47, <kernelmail.jms@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>A debug patch to verify if there is RCU callbacks before the rcu scheduler is active
> > So something gives me the impression we may have an answer somewhere in this dmesg for this... ;-)
> >
> > Here is my dmesg (the whole thing):
> >
> > function free_object_rcu
> > [ 0.166707] RCU scheduler is not active yet, Calling _call_rcu() with this function free_object_rcu
> > [....thousands of lines snipped...]
> > [ 0.225223] RCU scheduler is not active yet, Calling _call_rcu() with this function free_object_rcu
Thank you, Julie!
> Well this looks an awful lot like a smoking gun here...
>
> I can only find one function called "free_object_rcu", and it seems to be a
> static function in mm/kmemleak.c, and it certainly does this:
> call_rcu(&object->rcu, free_object_rcu);
>
> So the next question for you would be: Do all the messages go away if you
> turn off the kmemleak config option?
Hello, Kyle,
This is not at all showing a problem in free_object_rcu(), but rather
as a sanity-check for a shoot-from-the-hip fix. The fix seemed to
work, but my paranoia dictated that I check that my guess was correct.
Which it appears that it was.
So again, these messages do not indicate a problem in free_object_rcu().
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-28 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-19 22:41 Fw: RCU boot debug patch Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 5:27 ` RKK
2011-07-20 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-20 15:53 ` RKK
2011-07-20 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-21 5:39 ` RKK
2011-07-22 2:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-07-27 21:47 ` kernelmail.jms
2011-07-27 23:56 ` Kyle Moffett
2011-07-28 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-07-28 19:56 ` Julie Sullivan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110728000254.GB2318@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernelmail.jms@gmail.com \
--cc=kulkarni.ravi4@gmail.com \
--cc=kyle@moffetthome.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox