Re: [PATCH] [9/50] mmc: Added quirks for Ricoh 1180:e823 lower base clock

matsumur
2011-07-29T00:44:27Z

It's no misfunction. Just the wrong name.

Koji Matsumuro

Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote on 2011/07/29 09:37:03:

> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 09:27:56AM +0900, matsumur@nts.ricoh.co.jp wrote:
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > Ricoh 1180:e823 device is named R5U220/R5U232 (2 devices have the same
> > device ID ).
> > So, I think it should be declared to as PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5U220.

> Is that just the wrong name or will it actually cause misfunction?

> I will keep it if it's just the wrong name, but the name should be
probably
> fixed upstream.

> -Andi