* [PATCH RESEND] sched: fix false lockdep warning in set_task_cpu()
@ 2011-07-26 11:36 Mika Westerberg
2011-08-01 7:19 ` Mika Westerberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2011-07-26 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Mika Westerberg, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
When we have CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled we get occasionally following warning
on the system console at boot:
WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:2204 set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390()
Modules linked in:
Pid: 133, comm: mount Not tainted 3.0.0-rc2+ #70
Call Trace:
[<c104137d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6d/0xa0
[<c103d3b1>] ? set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
[<c103d3b1>] ? set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
[<c10413cd>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
[<c103d3b1>] set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
[<c103e0a7>] try_to_wake_up+0x127/0x250
[<c103e1db>] default_wake_function+0xb/0x10
[<c106290e>] autoremove_wake_function+0x1e/0x50
[<c102a2b0>] __wake_up_common+0x40/0x70
[<c102f2d7>] __wake_up+0x37/0x50
[<c12d36c0>] ? serial_m3110_enable_ms+0x10/0x10
[<c12d3715>] serial_m3110_con_write+0x55/0x60
[<c1041575>] __call_console_drivers+0x75/0x90
[<c10415d9>] _call_console_drivers+0x49/0x80
[<c1041baa>] console_unlock+0xca/0x1f0
[<c10420ef>] vprintk+0x18f/0x4f0
[<c10787cb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
[<c107985e>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x4e/0x4c0
[<c10787cb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
[<c14928a3>] printk+0x18/0x1a
[<c115dd4e>] ext3_msg+0x3e/0x40
[<c116046a>] ext3_fill_super+0x16ba/0x1960
[<c11478b8>] ? disk_name+0x88/0xc0
[<c10fa88d>] mount_bdev+0x16d/0x1b0
[<c10ed667>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0xf7/0x280
[<c1112021>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x81/0x140
[<c115d20a>] ext3_mount+0x1a/0x20
[<c115edb0>] ? ext3_clear_journal_err+0xa0/0xa0
[<c10f95dc>] mount_fs+0x1c/0xc0
[<c10d763a>] ? __alloc_percpu+0xa/0x10
[<c111203b>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x9b/0x140
[<c1112896>] vfs_kern_mount+0x46/0xa0
[<c1113609>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xd0
[<c1114087>] do_mount+0x2c7/0x680
[<c10d31f9>] ? strndup_user+0x49/0x60
[<c11144a6>] sys_mount+0x66/0xa0
[<c14976d0>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
This is due the fact that printk() disables lockdep before the output is
passed to the actual console driver. If the console driver happens to call
some functions which eventually calls set_task_cpu() we end up failing the
following test:
WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
This is because lockdep_is_held() returns 0 if lockdep is temporarily
disabled.
So we check whether lockdep is enabled and only then validate the locks.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 9769c75..1177f81 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2211,8 +2211,9 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
* Furthermore, all task_rq users should acquire both locks, see
* task_rq_lock().
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
- lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion &&
+ !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
+ lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
#endif
#endif
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND] sched: fix false lockdep warning in set_task_cpu()
2011-07-26 11:36 [PATCH RESEND] sched: fix false lockdep warning in set_task_cpu() Mika Westerberg
@ 2011-08-01 7:19 ` Mika Westerberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2011-08-01 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 02:36:01PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When we have CONFIG_LOCKDEP enabled we get occasionally following warning
> on the system console at boot:
Ping.
Peter, Ingo: any comments on this patch?
>
> WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:2204 set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390()
> Modules linked in:
> Pid: 133, comm: mount Not tainted 3.0.0-rc2+ #70
> Call Trace:
> [<c104137d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6d/0xa0
> [<c103d3b1>] ? set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
> [<c103d3b1>] ? set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
> [<c10413cd>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20
> [<c103d3b1>] set_task_cpu+0x1a1/0x390
> [<c103e0a7>] try_to_wake_up+0x127/0x250
> [<c103e1db>] default_wake_function+0xb/0x10
> [<c106290e>] autoremove_wake_function+0x1e/0x50
> [<c102a2b0>] __wake_up_common+0x40/0x70
> [<c102f2d7>] __wake_up+0x37/0x50
> [<c12d36c0>] ? serial_m3110_enable_ms+0x10/0x10
> [<c12d3715>] serial_m3110_con_write+0x55/0x60
> [<c1041575>] __call_console_drivers+0x75/0x90
> [<c10415d9>] _call_console_drivers+0x49/0x80
> [<c1041baa>] console_unlock+0xca/0x1f0
> [<c10420ef>] vprintk+0x18f/0x4f0
> [<c10787cb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
> [<c107985e>] ? lockdep_init_map+0x4e/0x4c0
> [<c10787cb>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
> [<c14928a3>] printk+0x18/0x1a
> [<c115dd4e>] ext3_msg+0x3e/0x40
> [<c116046a>] ext3_fill_super+0x16ba/0x1960
> [<c11478b8>] ? disk_name+0x88/0xc0
> [<c10fa88d>] mount_bdev+0x16d/0x1b0
> [<c10ed667>] ? __kmalloc_track_caller+0xf7/0x280
> [<c1112021>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x81/0x140
> [<c115d20a>] ext3_mount+0x1a/0x20
> [<c115edb0>] ? ext3_clear_journal_err+0xa0/0xa0
> [<c10f95dc>] mount_fs+0x1c/0xc0
> [<c10d763a>] ? __alloc_percpu+0xa/0x10
> [<c111203b>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0x9b/0x140
> [<c1112896>] vfs_kern_mount+0x46/0xa0
> [<c1113609>] do_kern_mount+0x39/0xd0
> [<c1114087>] do_mount+0x2c7/0x680
> [<c10d31f9>] ? strndup_user+0x49/0x60
> [<c11144a6>] sys_mount+0x66/0xa0
> [<c14976d0>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
>
> This is due the fact that printk() disables lockdep before the output is
> passed to the actual console driver. If the console driver happens to call
> some functions which eventually calls set_task_cpu() we end up failing the
> following test:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
> lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
>
> This is because lockdep_is_held() returns 0 if lockdep is temporarily
> disabled.
>
> So we check whether lockdep is enabled and only then validate the locks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 9769c75..1177f81 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -2211,8 +2211,9 @@ void set_task_cpu(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int new_cpu)
> * Furthermore, all task_rq users should acquire both locks, see
> * task_rq_lock().
> */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
> - lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(debug_locks && !current->lockdep_recursion &&
> + !(lockdep_is_held(&p->pi_lock) ||
> + lockdep_is_held(&task_rq(p)->lock)));
> #endif
> #endif
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-01 7:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-26 11:36 [PATCH RESEND] sched: fix false lockdep warning in set_task_cpu() Mika Westerberg
2011-08-01 7:19 ` Mika Westerberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox