From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:38:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110802043853.GH11811@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110801002933.GB20641@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
[Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change] On 01/08/2011 (Mon 09:29) Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:44:25PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > On 11-07-29 11:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking
> > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that.
>
> > Thanks, I'll apply it to the module.h cleanup branch that is soaking
> > in linux-next.
>
> There's a bunch of other changes fixing issues with this floating around
> - Randy Dunlap sent something for a regulator driver the other day and
> I've got a couple of other Samsung patches I sent on the basis that this
> must have been caused by a change in the Samsung headers.
It is all taken care of, so you don't have to worry. It isn't a change
specific to any Samsung headers. If you are interested to know the
background of what is being changed and why, this is a good start.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/27/459
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/12
Thanks,
Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-02 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-29 15:19 [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change Mark Brown
2011-07-30 17:44 ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-08-01 0:29 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-02 4:38 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2011-08-03 5:35 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-03 15:28 ` Paul Gortmaker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-29 14:26 Mark Brown
2011-07-29 14:48 ` Dave Jones
2011-07-29 15:01 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-29 15:08 ` Dave Jones
2011-07-29 15:13 ` Mark Brown
2011-07-29 15:16 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110802043853.GH11811@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox