From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753436Ab1HBEjz (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:39:55 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:35703 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605Ab1HBEjA (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:39:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:38:54 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Mark Brown CC: Dave Jones , , , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change Message-ID: <20110802043853.GH11811@windriver.com> References: <1311952766-11693-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E3442F9.2060901@windriver.com> <20110801002933.GB20641@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110801002933.GB20641@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change] On 01/08/2011 (Mon 09:29) Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:44:25PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > On 11-07-29 11:19 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Some header change has removed an implicit include of module.h, breaking > > > the build due to the use of THIS_MODULE. Fix that. > > > Thanks, I'll apply it to the module.h cleanup branch that is soaking > > in linux-next. > > There's a bunch of other changes fixing issues with this floating around > - Randy Dunlap sent something for a regulator driver the other day and > I've got a couple of other Samsung patches I sent on the basis that this > must have been caused by a change in the Samsung headers. It is all taken care of, so you don't have to worry. It isn't a change specific to any Samsung headers. If you are interested to know the background of what is being changed and why, this is a good start. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/27/459 https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/28/12 Thanks, Paul.