public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + shm-fix-a-race-between-shm_exit-and-shm_init.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:04:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803140456.GA14393@redhat.com> (raw)

> From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
>
> On thread exit shm_exit_ns() is called, it uses shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex.  It
> is initialized in shm_init(), but it is not called yet at the moment of
> kernel threads exit.  Some kernel threads are created in
> do_pre_smp_initcalls(), and shm_init() is called in do_initcalls().
>
> Static initialization of shm_ids(init_ipc_ns).rw_mutex fixes the race.

Yes, it is safe to call down_right() now.

But the code does

	down_write(rw_mutex);
	if (.in_use)
		idr_for_each(.ipcs_idr);

and thus it relies on the static initializer anyway. it is not safe
to do idr_for_each() before idr_init() in theory.

And since we rely on .in_use == 0, why we can't move this check
outside of down_write/up_right to a) optimize the code and b)
fix the problem?

Oleg.


             reply	other threads:[~2011-08-03 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-03 14:04 Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-08-03 18:24 ` + shm-fix-a-race-between-shm_exit-and-shm_init.patch added to -mm tree Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 18:26   ` [PATCH] shm: fix wrong tests Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 18:28   ` [PATCH] shm: optimize exit_shm() Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 19:08     ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 19:16       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 19:29         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-03 19:41           ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 19:43             ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-03 19:21     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-03 19:34       ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-03 19:39         ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-03 19:18   ` + shm-fix-a-race-between-shm_exit-and-shm_init.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110803140456.GA14393@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=segoon@openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox