From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755675Ab1HCM6K (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:58:10 -0400 Received: from webbox1416.server-home.net ([77.236.96.61]:57423 "EHLO webbox1416.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755544Ab1HCM6D (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 08:58:03 -0400 From: Alexander Stein To: "R, Durgadoss" Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU (TunnelCreek)? Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:58:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "guenter.roeck@ericsson.com" , Jean Delvare , "Yu, Fenghua" , "lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <201106271220.51953.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> <1309193405.8271.645.camel@groeck In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201108031458.01805.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Monday 27 June 2011 18:54:44 R, Durgadoss wrote: > > Unfortunately, looking at Alexander's /proc/cpuinfo output, it looks > > like the E6xx chips have no mention of E6xx in the CPU ID string, which > > unfortunately kills the idea. > > > > Do you know if there is _any_ means to distinguish E6xx from E6xxT ? > > Sorry I do not know. But I can ask some folks here and get back > to you guys. Should not take more time, once I identify the right > person to ask :-) Any news on this topic? Regards, Alexander