From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752742Ab1HCP2n (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:28:43 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:49961 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750997Ab1HCP2i (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:28:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 11:28:19 -0400 From: Paul Gortmaker To: Mark Brown CC: Dave Jones , , , Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change Message-ID: <20110803152819.GK16484@windriver.com> References: <1311952766-11693-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E3442F9.2060901@windriver.com> <20110801002933.GB20641@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20110802043853.GH11811@windriver.com> <20110803053510.GB16141@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110803053510.GB16141@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Fix build of s3c64xx cpufreq driver for header change] On 03/08/2011 (Wed 14:35) Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:38:54AM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > It is all taken care of, so you don't have to worry. It isn't a change > > specific to any Samsung headers. If you are interested to know the > > I'm not worried, I'm now perfectly aware of the source of the breakage. > My goal is to make sure that you're aware that there are other patches > for this stuff that have been submitted separately which you're likely > to collide with if you're fixing these issues yourself. As long as commits end up in Linus' tree directly or in one of the queues that are a part of the linux-next infrastructure, we have good visibility of any conflicts thanks to Stephen R's work with next. Paul.