From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932261Ab1HCXcN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:32:13 -0400
Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:60367 "EHLO
	out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932248Ab1HCXbi (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:31:38 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: 7JoySWKVH9jYORSinmifU807cD/49MvjgcJvG494hO8b 1312414297
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:26:17 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Maillist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: will someone make 2.6.39.* a longterm ?
Message-ID: <20110803232617.GA17426@kroah.com>
References: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1108031203500.16528@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1108031203500.16528@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 12:05:58PM -0800, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
> 	Hello All ,  Is anyone looking at making 2.6.39.* into a longterm
> stable ?

No, why would they?

Or, to turn it the other way, why do you feel .39 would be a viable
longer kernel to maintain?  What are you using it for that requires it
to be handled in this manner?

thanks,

greg k-h