From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755733Ab1HERQU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:16:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16705 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752783Ab1HERQT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:16:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:16:07 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Pekka Enberg , Markus Trippelsdorf , Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe Subject: Re: list corruption in the last few days. (block ? crypto ?) Message-ID: <20110805171607.GA11703@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , Markus Trippelsdorf , Linux Kernel , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe References: <20110805010038.GA18148@redhat.com> <20110805084614.GA1588@x4.trippels.de> <20110805163948.GA11113@redhat.com> <20110805165119.GA11593@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 12:01:38PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 11:47:56AM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > > > > Not sure if you were addressing my original report (quoted above), or the networking > > > > related report in this part of the thread. But anyway, I had it turned on (as well as just about > > > > every other debugging option). I didn't see anything output from it though, > > > > just the LIST_DEBUG warnings. > > > > > > But CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON was off? If slab debugging was on then this could > > > be an issue with full slab list management instead of partial lists. > > > > $ grep SLUB_DEBUG_ON .config > > CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG_ON=y > > Argh another debugging code issue. Anyone who sees this please verify that > it also occurs with debugging off. I ran this code for 9 months in > various configs but only sporadically with debugging support since that > switches the lockless stuff. This started turning up immediately as soon as it got merged to mainline. Which leads me to believe no-one is running -next with debugging on either. Perhaps we should force debugging on for a week once per release cycle. Dave