From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754788Ab1HERz2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:55:28 -0400 Received: from s15228384.onlinehome-server.info ([87.106.30.177]:44064 "EHLO mail.x86-64.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082Ab1HERz0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 13:55:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:55:22 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Avi Kivity , "Przywara, Andre" , "Pohlack, Martin" , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3.1 0/3] x86, AMD: Correct F15h IC aliasing issue Message-ID: <20110805175522.GA26217@aftab> References: <1312550110-24160-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org> <4E3C2405.8090309@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E3C2405.8090309@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 01:10:29PM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Patch 2 I'm going to object to because it puts your run_on_bsp method > into a different structure where all the existing methods for this > already are in a way that looks totally gratuitous to me. Why not just > have a c_bsp_init on struct cpu_dev like all the other methods? Indeed, cpu_dev is actually the only logical place to put them, thanks. I'm sending updated versions as a reply to this message. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach GM: Alberto Bozzo Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551