From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752745Ab1HIICT (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:02:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:17695 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752517Ab1HIICR (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Aug 2011 04:02:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 10:01:59 +0200 From: Johannes Weiner To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , Michal Hocko , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , abrestic@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] memcg: add memory.vmscan_stat Message-ID: <20110809080159.GA32015@redhat.com> References: <20110722171540.74eb9aa7.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110808124333.GA31739@redhat.com> <20110809083345.46cbc8de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110809083345.46cbc8de.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 08:33:45AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:43:33 +0200 > Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On a non-technical note: as Ying Han and I were the other two people > > working on reclaim and statistics, it really irks me that neither of > > us were CCd on this. Especially on such a controversial change. > > I always drop CC if no reply/review comes. There is always the possibility that a single mail in an otherwise unrelated patch series is overlooked (especially while on vacation ;). Getting CCd on revisions and -mm inclusion is a really nice reminder. Unless there is a really good reason not to (is there ever?), could you please keep CCs?