public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Konrad <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV devices in kexec or crash kernel
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:44:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110809094443.GD7283@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312881788.26263.50.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>

On Tue, Aug 09, Ian Campbell wrote:

> >  static int frontend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> >  				   unsigned long event,
> >  				   void *data)
> >  {
> > +	/* reset devices in Connected or Closed state */
> > +	if (xen_hvm_domain())
>                                && reset_devices ??

No, reset_devices is passed as kernel cmdline option to a kdump boot.
But its not part of a kexec boot.

> How long should we wait for the backend to respond? Should we add a
> timeout and countdown similar to wait_for_devices?

Adding a timeout to catch a confused backend is a good idea. That would
give one at least a chance to poke around in a rescue shell.

> It's unfortunate that this code is effectively serialising on each
> device. It would be much preferable to kick off all the resets and then
> wait for them to occur. You could probably do this by incrementing a
> counter for each device you reset and decrementing it each time a watch
> triggers then wait for the counter to hit zero.

That feature needs more thought. Since xenbus_reset_state() is only
executed in the kexec/kdump case, the average use case is not slowed
down.

Olaf

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-04 16:20 [PATCH 0/3] [v4] kexec and kdump for Xen PVonHVM guests Olaf Hering
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: add xs_introduce to shutdown watches from old kernel Olaf Hering
2011-08-09  9:15   ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09  9:28     ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: rebind virqs to existing eventchannel ports Olaf Hering
2011-08-09  9:17   ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09  9:29     ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 11:25       ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 15:28     ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 18:51       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV devices in kexec or crash kernel Olaf Hering
2011-08-09  9:23   ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09  9:44     ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2011-08-09 11:26       ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 19:02 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] [v4] kexec and kdump for Xen PVonHVM guests Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110809094443.GD7283@aepfle.de \
    --to=olaf@aepfle.de \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox