From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Konrad <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV devices in kexec or crash kernel
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 11:44:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110809094443.GD7283@aepfle.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312881788.26263.50.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, Aug 09, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > static int frontend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> > unsigned long event,
> > void *data)
> > {
> > + /* reset devices in Connected or Closed state */
> > + if (xen_hvm_domain())
> && reset_devices ??
No, reset_devices is passed as kernel cmdline option to a kdump boot.
But its not part of a kexec boot.
> How long should we wait for the backend to respond? Should we add a
> timeout and countdown similar to wait_for_devices?
Adding a timeout to catch a confused backend is a good idea. That would
give one at least a chance to poke around in a rescue shell.
> It's unfortunate that this code is effectively serialising on each
> device. It would be much preferable to kick off all the resets and then
> wait for them to occur. You could probably do this by incrementing a
> counter for each device you reset and decrementing it each time a watch
> triggers then wait for the counter to hit zero.
That feature needs more thought. Since xenbus_reset_state() is only
executed in the kexec/kdump case, the average use case is not slowed
down.
Olaf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-09 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-04 16:20 [PATCH 0/3] [v4] kexec and kdump for Xen PVonHVM guests Olaf Hering
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: add xs_introduce to shutdown watches from old kernel Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 9:15 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 9:28 ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: rebind virqs to existing eventchannel ports Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 9:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 9:29 ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 11:25 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 15:28 ` Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 18:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-08-04 16:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PV devices in kexec or crash kernel Olaf Hering
2011-08-09 9:23 ` [Xen-devel] " Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 9:44 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2011-08-09 11:26 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-09 19:02 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] [v4] kexec and kdump for Xen PVonHVM guests Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110809094443.GD7283@aepfle.de \
--to=olaf@aepfle.de \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox