From: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11 re-post take #2] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 16:44:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110815204438.GA7157@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313131164.27549.18.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:39:24PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:52 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> > Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with
> > a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) macro.
> []
> > diff --git a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
> []
> > @@ -54,33 +54,28 @@ extern int __dynamic_netdev_dbg(struct _ddebug *descriptor,
> > const char *fmt, ...)
> > __attribute__ ((format (printf, 3, 4)));
> >
> > +#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
> > + static struct _ddebug name \
> > + __used \
> > + __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
> > + { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
> > + _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }
>
> Hey again Jason.
>
> From a kernel coding style consistency POV, shouldn't
> this use c99 named initializers?
yes, that would be better than what we have now.
>
> #define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
> static struct _ddebug name = { \
> .modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
> .function = __func__, \
> .filename = __FILE__, \
> .format = fmt, \
> .lineno = __LINE__, \
> .flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \
> .enabled = false, \
> } __used __aligned(8) __attribute__((section("__verbose")))
>
> If the pr_debug/dynamic_debug inversion is done,
> the .enabled flag should be set on as well when
> -DDEBUG is set, correct?
right, but I'm leaving this to a subsequent patch.
>
> > #define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
> > - static struct _ddebug descriptor \
> > - __used \
> > - __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
> > - { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
> > - _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
> > + DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
> > if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
> > - __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> > + __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> > } while (0)
>
> Perhaps
>
> #define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
> if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
> __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), \
> ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> } while (0)
ok.
>
> Lastly, are the unlikely()s really useful?
>
I think the unlikely's make sense, since we don't expect these to be
enabled by default.
So, I've re-spun the patch, with the above comments (below). Thanks!
-Jason
Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with
a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_META_DATA(name, fmt) macro.
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/dynamic_debug.h | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
index feaac1e..699f533 100644
--- a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
+++ b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
@@ -54,35 +54,41 @@ extern int __dynamic_netdev_dbg(struct _ddebug *descriptor,
const char *fmt, ...)
__attribute__ ((format (printf, 3, 4)));
-#define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
- static struct _ddebug descriptor \
- __used \
- __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
- { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
- _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
- if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
- __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
- } while (0)
-
-#define dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, fmt, ...) do { \
- static struct _ddebug descriptor \
- __used \
- __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
- { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
- _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
- if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
- __dynamic_dev_dbg(&descriptor, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
- } while (0)
-
-#define dynamic_netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ...) do { \
- static struct _ddebug descriptor \
- __used \
- __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
- { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
- _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
- if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
- __dynamic_netdev_dbg(&descriptor, dev, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__);\
- } while (0)
+#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
+ static struct _ddebug __used __aligned(8) \
+ __attribute__((section("__verbose"))) name = { \
+ .modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
+ .function = __func__, \
+ .filename = __FILE__, \
+ .format = fmt, \
+ .lineno = __LINE__, \
+ .flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \
+ .enabled = false, \
+ }
+
+#define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
+ if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
+ __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define dynamic_dev_dbg(dev, fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
+ if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
+ __dynamic_dev_dbg(&descriptor, dev, fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
+
+#define dynamic_netdev_dbg(dev, fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
+ if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
+ __dynamic_netdev_dbg(&descriptor, dev, fmt, \
+ ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
#else
--
1.7.5.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 18:36 [PATCH 00/11] various fixes v3 Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] dynamic_debug: Add __dynamic_dev_dbg Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] dynamic_debug: Consolidate prefix output to single routine Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] dynamic_debug: Remove uses of KERN_CONT in dynamic_emit_prefix Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] dynamic_debug: Convert printks to pr_<level> Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] dynamic_debug: remove unused control variables Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] dynamic_debug: add Jason Baron as maintainer Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] dynamic_debug: make netdev_dbg() call __netdev_printk() Jason Baron
2011-09-01 14:57 ` [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-01 15:18 ` Jason Baron
2011-09-18 8:27 ` Greg KH
2011-09-18 17:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-18 18:27 ` Greg KH
2011-09-18 18:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-19 13:48 ` Jason Baron
2011-09-19 16:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] dynamic_debug: make netif_dbg() call __netdev_printk() Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions Jason Baron
2011-08-11 19:02 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-11 20:52 ` [PATCH 09/11 re-post] " Jason Baron
2011-08-12 6:39 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-15 20:44 ` Jason Baron [this message]
2011-08-15 23:12 ` [PATCH 09/11 re-post take #2] " Joe Perches
2011-08-16 13:59 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] dynamic_debug: remove num_enabled accounting Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] dynamic_debug: use a single printk() to emit msgs Jason Baron
2011-08-23 1:32 ` [PATCH 00/11] various fixes v3 Greg KH
2011-08-23 13:54 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-23 15:15 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110815204438.GA7157@redhat.com \
--to=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox