Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()

Matt Fleming
2011-08-18T11:09:24Z

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> This does look like a decent clean up, especially because so many
> architectures got this sequence wrong in the past. But yeah, it will
> require me to rewrite half my series ;-)
>
> Is it worth rewriting the series? Dunno. I'm not convinced that the
> wrapper buys us enough for that, plus it'd increase the number of
> patches.
>
> Maybe it'd be better to do it as a separate set of patches?

OK so, I went ahead and rewrote the series using your clean up. It's in
the 'oleg/set-current-blocked-v2' branch at,

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/linux-2.6.git

Would you mind taking a quick look and see which series you prefer? I'll
wait for your reply before I resend any patches.

--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center