From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755972Ab1HRMrt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:47:49 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:40868 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754840Ab1HRMrr (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:47:47 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:47:02 +0200 From: Stefan Richter To: James Bottomley Cc: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com, stephenmcameron@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Document generic scsi device attributes Message-ID: <20110818144702.1b2e4616@stein> In-Reply-To: <1313613307.6345.8.camel@mulgrave> References: <20110817182055.8848.75862.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> <1313610306.6345.4.camel@mulgrave> <20110817200028.GB8422@beardog.cce.hp.com> <1313613307.6345.8.camel@mulgrave> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.4; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Aug 17 James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:00 -0500, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:45:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote: > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > > > > +What: /sys/class/scsi_device/..../device/device_blocked > > > > +Date: December, 2002 > > > > +KernelVersion: Unknown > > > > +Contact: James Bottomley > > > > > > Hmm, so I get fingered for every screw up in our sysfs ABI? nice wide > > > receiver buck pass move. > > > > Uh, sorry if that wasn't the right thing to do, which it sounds > > like it wasn't. I just put your name there because you're the SCSI > > maintainer. I can dig through all the commits and see who added what > > if that's preferable. Or leave the names out? or something else? > > No, don't worry, the patch is the right thing to do ... I was just > slightly amused to see my name down for all of it. Isn't linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org acceptable if not even preferable as contact? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-== =--- =--=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/