From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys_futex
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:19:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110818201911.GF22920@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4BF7C0.80703@cavium.com>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:17:52AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >index 46c4763..f48b18e 100644
> >--- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
> >@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ sys_call_table:
> > PTR sys_fremovexattr /* 4235 */
> > PTR sys_tkill
> > PTR sys_sendfile64
> >- PTR compat_sys_futex
> >+ PTR sys_32_futex
>
> This change is redundant, scall64-o32.S already does the right thing
> so additional zero extending is not needed and is just extra
> instructions to execute for no reason.
Compat_sys_futex is a syscall entry point and for some configurations
such as CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS SYSCALL_DEFINE*() will do additional work
beyond cleaning up the arguments. The 3 unnecessary shifts are the
overhead we just gotta live with.
> > PTR compat_sys_sched_setaffinity
> > PTR compat_sys_sched_getaffinity /* 4240 */
> > PTR compat_sys_io_setup
>
> But really I think this patch fixes things at the wrong level. Each
> architecture potentially needs a similar patch. What would happen if
> we did something like:
> +++ b/kernel/futex_compat.c
> @@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ err_unlock:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -asmlinkage long compat_sys_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val,
> - struct compat_timespec __user *utime, u32 __user *uaddr2,
> - u32 val3)
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(compat_sys_futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int , op, u32, val,
> + struct compat_timespec __user *, utime, u32 __user *, uaddr2,
> + u32, val3)
> {
> struct timespec ts;
> ktime_t t, *tp = NULL;
>
> Obviously the function name is wrong, but a varient of
> SYSCALL_DEFINE*() could be created so the proper function names are
> produced.
Right now none of the the generic compat_ functions is wrapped in
SYSCALL_DEFINE* because for some architectures a further wrapper function
is needed. It seems some architectures call compat_ calls directly
without SYSCALL_DEFINE* which with CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is a bug ...
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 1:54 [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys_futex Yong Zhang
2011-08-17 12:43 ` Ralf Baechle
2011-08-17 17:17 ` David Daney
2011-08-18 2:32 ` Yong Zhang
2011-08-18 16:23 ` David Daney
2011-08-19 1:56 ` Yong Zhang
2011-08-18 2:44 ` Yong Zhang
2011-08-18 20:19 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2011-08-19 3:49 ` How to trace compat syscalls? [Was Re: [PATCH] MIPS: use 32-bit wrapper for compat_sys_futex] Yong Zhang
2011-08-19 4:15 ` Yong Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110818201911.GF22920@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=yong.zhang@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox