Re: [PATCH] scsi: Document generic scsi device attributes

James Bottomley
2011-08-17T20:35:11Z

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:00 -0500, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:45:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote:
> > > From: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen M. Cameron <scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..ad2d36b
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> > > +What: /sys/class/scsi_device/..../device/device_blocked
> > > +Date: December, 2002
> > > +KernelVersion: Unknown
> > > +Contact: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> >
> > Hmm, so I get fingered for every screw up in our sysfs ABI? nice wide
> > receiver buck pass move.
>
> Uh, sorry if that wasn't the right thing to do, which it sounds
> like it wasn't. I just put your name there because you're the SCSI
> maintainer. I can dig through all the commits and see who added what
> if that's preferable. Or leave the names out? or something else?

No, don't worry, the patch is the right thing to do ... I was just
slightly amused to see my name down for all of it.

James