From: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
ying.huang@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jason.wessel@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/6] x86, nmi: print out NMI stats in /proc/interrupts
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:28:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822152839.GE2067@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314023262.24275.38.camel@twins>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:37 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > NMI: 4161 4155 158 4194 Non-maskable interrupts
> > SWA: 0 0 0 0 Unknown NMIs swallowed
> > 0: 4161 4155 158 4194 NMI PMI, arch_bt
> > UNK: 0 0 0 0 NMI
> > EXT: 0 0 0 0 NMI
>
> Yeah, not too pretty.. I would have expected something like:
>
> NMI:
> PMI:
> uv:
> arch_bt:
> ...
> swallowed:
> unknown:
Yeah, I kinda wanted to do that originally, but wasn't sure what the rules
were for the output structure of that file. I even toyed with the idea of
creating a /proc/nmi file to do that too, but thought that it might confuse
people.
>
> But then, I'm sure some people would complain to that as I'm pretty sure
> it'll break stuff parsing /proc/interrupts
That's why I just posted my half-ass patch to see if it was
- useful info
- gather ideas on the best way to present it
Cheers,
Don
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 20:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] x86, nmi: new NMI handling routines Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] x86, nmi: split out nmi from traps.c Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:21 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-22 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:41 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-22 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 14:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:23 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-23 14:14 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-23 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 17:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-24 17:44 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-24 17:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 18:16 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-24 18:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 19:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:25 ` Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: track NMI usage stats Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] x86, nmi: print out NMI stats in /proc/interrupts Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:28 ` Don Zickus [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110822152839.GE2067@redhat.com \
--to=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox