From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751937Ab1HVPl3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:41:29 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41308 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750961Ab1HVPl1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:41:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:41:17 -0400 From: Don Zickus To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen , Robert Richter , ying.huang@intel.com, LKML , jason.wessel@windriver.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines Message-ID: <20110822154117.GF2067@redhat.com> References: <1313786266-9585-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1313786266-9585-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com> <1314022429.24275.30.camel@twins> <20110822152154.GB2067@redhat.com> <1314026812.24275.67.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1314026812.24275.67.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 05:26:52PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:21 -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > > > Sure. Well there are a few drivers that want to register. Unless you > > want to make a rule that all nmi handlers have to be built-in? > > Well, I'm all for that, but I guess I'm going to loose that particular > fight ;-) :-) I don't care either way, but from a technical point of view, you would have trouble with getting oprofile as a built-in I would think. Cheers, Don