public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:42:10 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822204209.GA3490@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E52BA31.4030203@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:21:05AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> On 08/23/2011 03:59 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> >> +	if (!vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map && !mmu_is_nested(vcpu))
> >> +		gpa = kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_write(vcpu, cr2, NULL);
> > 
> > Why write? 
> > 
> 
> Since the fault is caused by page table written, and the 'gpa' can
> be written after instruction is retied.
> 
> >> +	kvm_mmu_unprotect_page(vcpu->kvm, gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >> +
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * The shadow pages have been zapped, then we call the page
> >> +	 * fault path to change the mapping to writable.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	vcpu->arch.mmu.page_fault(vcpu, cr2, PFERR_WRITE_MASK, true);
> > 
> > I don't see why is this necessary. Just allowing the instruction to
> > proceed should be enough?
> > 
> 
> It used to avoid later VM-exit, since we will retry the instruction
> but the mapped is still read-only. So we can it to let the mapping become
> writable to avoid page fault again.

Its not like this case is performance sensitive. Usually optimizing
things without the need for it leads to bad results. So please drop 
this.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-22 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-16  6:40 [PATCH 01/11] KVM: MMU: avoid pte_list_desc running out in kvm_mmu_pte_write Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:41 ` [PATCH 02/11] KVM: x86: tag the instructions which are used to write page table Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 14:32   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-22 14:36     ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-16  6:42 ` [PATCH 03/11] KVM: x86: retry non-page-table writing instruction Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 19:59   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-22 20:21     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 20:42       ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2011-08-16  6:42 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: x86: cleanup port-in/port-out emulated Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:43 ` [PATCH 05/11] KVM: MMU: do not mark access bit on pte write path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:44 ` [PATCH 06/11] KVM: MMU: cleanup FNAME(invlpg) Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:44 ` [PATCH 07/11] KVM: MMU: fast prefetch spte on invlpg path Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-22 22:28   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23  1:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] KVM: MMU: remove unnecessary kvm_mmu_free_some_pages Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:45 ` [PATCH 09/11] KVM: MMU: split kvm_mmu_pte_write function Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] KVM: MMU: fix detecting misaligned accessed Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-16  6:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] KVM: MMU: improve write flooding detected Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23  8:00   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 10:55     ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 12:38       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 16:32         ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-23 19:09           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-23 20:16             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-24 20:05               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  2:04                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25  4:42                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 13:21                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-25 14:06                       ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25 14:07                         ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-25  7:40                   ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25  7:57             ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-25 13:47               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26  3:18                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-08-26 10:53                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-08-26 14:24                     ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110822204209.GA3490@amt.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox