From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754879Ab1HWVDv (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:03:51 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34870 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751791Ab1HWVDp (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:03:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:03:09 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Tejun Heo , lkml , "David S. Miller" , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] memblock: add memblock_start_of_DRAM() Message-Id: <20110823140309.9a7b36dd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20110806185923.GA8494@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <20110806185923.GA8494@merkur.ravnborg.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:59:23 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > SPARC32 require access to the start address. > Add a new helper memblock_start_of_DRAM() to give > access to the address of the first memblock - which > contains the lowest address. > What is the status of the sparc32 patches which need this change? If they're in some other tree then I'd suggest that this patch (which needed some small changes for current mainline) join them in that tree. Or we could slip this change into mainline immediately if that makes life easier. Or we could just wait for 3.1.