From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752403Ab1HXFeO (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:34:14 -0400 Received: from linux-sh.org ([111.68.239.195]:35219 "EHLO linux-sh.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750835Ab1HXFeK (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:34:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:33:18 +0900 From: Paul Mundt To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM mailing list , LKML , Magnus Damm , Alan Stern Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] sh-sci / PM: Use power.irq_safe Message-ID: <20110824053317.GC26391@linux-sh.org> References: <201108202131.19479.rjw@sisk.pl> <201108212109.30399.rjw@sisk.pl> <201108212111.45012.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201108212111.45012.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:11:44PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Since sci_port_enable() and sci_port_disable() may be run with > interrupts off and they execute pm_runtime_get_sync() and > pm_runtime_put_sync(), respectively, the SCI device's > power.irq_safe flags has to be used to indicate that it is safe > to execute runtime PM callbacks for this device with interrupts off. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Not sure how you want this one handled. Did you simply want to roll this in with your other patch with my Acked-by, or should I be taking this through my tree already regardless of the 1/2 patch?