From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Cc: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Subject: Re: Broken pci_block_user_cfg_access interface
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 22:07:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110825190748.GA30587@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5699D8.3070505@web.de>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:52:08PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2011-08-25 20:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:06:01PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> I took a look at the sysfs triggered pci reset function and don't see any way
> >>> that the controlling device driver ever gets to be involved in this reset.
> >>> If code outside the ipr driver were to reset the adapter, the adapter firmware
> >>> would be left in an uninitialized state and until scsi core starts timing
> >>> out ops and driving EH, the card would be unusable. I can't imagine the
> >>> ipr driver is unique in this.
> >>
> >> Right, that's why a PCI core service is needed for coordination.
> >>
> >> Jan
> >
> > But why do we want to trigger reset through sysfs while the
> > driver runs?
>
> A perfectly valid race conditions are created by KVM and VFIO: shared
> IRQ handler is triggered while the user space part wants to reset the
> assigned device.
OK, that would be solved by blocking sysfs reset while
config access is blocked, right?
> I'm quite sure that this how I first caused this bug to
> show up (it triggered for an assigned device with a shared busy IRQ line
> during QEMU startup, ie. the initial guest reset).
>
> Jan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-25 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 10:43 Broken pci_block_user_cfg_access interface Jan Kiszka
2011-08-24 15:02 ` Brian King
2011-08-25 9:19 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 9:40 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 10:34 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:06 ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:12 ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:16 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 13:24 ` Brian King
2011-08-25 18:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 13:02 ` Brian King
2011-08-25 13:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 18:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-25 18:52 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-25 19:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2011-08-25 19:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 15:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 15:42 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 15:58 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 16:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 16:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-29 16:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 18:47 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-08-29 19:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-30 16:30 ` Brian King
2011-08-30 18:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-30 19:41 ` Brian King
2011-09-02 7:48 ` [RFC] pci: Rework config space blocking services Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 7:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 7:18 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 8:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 8:27 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-06 8:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-09-06 8:48 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-09-07 13:46 ` Brian King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110825190748.GA30587@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox