From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755732Ab1HYWgO (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:36:14 -0400 Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:42229 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755698Ab1HYWgN (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:36:13 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: CrFLH39c56wCULICfYKqN7OsB8rRpbwDe/6SZM6VPBRA 1314311772 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:35:45 -0700 From: Greg KH To: KY Srinivasan Cc: "gregkh@suse.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "virtualization@lists.osdl.org" , Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/59] Staging: hv: vmbus: Get rid of the unused name field in struct hv_driver Message-ID: <20110825223545.GA6055@kroah.com> References: <1314290866-2644-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1314290965-2698-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <1314290965-2698-22-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> <20110825212428.GA1617@kroah.com> <20110825212820.GA6770@kroah.com> <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E048081B360E@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E048081B360E@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:27:40PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote: > This was existing code and I realized it did not conform to the Linux > Driver Model. I fixed it in the patch set I had sent earlier (110/117). > Yesterday I only got up to 74 of the 117 patches that you commented on. > I was planning to send the rest today. If it is ok with you, please don't fix it here > As it would break everything else. This is existing code that I am fixing in the patch set > I will send you shortly. Oops, as you see, I applied it :) And I applied the rest of your series, so you might want to re-test and resync your next series of patches based on what I have in the staging-next tree now. thanks, greg k-h