public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, bblum@andrew.cmu.edu,
	lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, oleg@redhat.com, paul@paulmenage.org,
	tj@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] cgroups: Don't attach task to subsystem if migration failed
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:38:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826153843.GE3298@somewhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108252044.p7PKiaHd006997@imap1.linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 01:44:36PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
> 
> The patch titled
>      cgroups: fix ordering of calls in cgroup_attach_proc
> has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
>      cgroups-fix-ordering-of-calls-in-cgroup_attach_proc.patch
> 
> Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
>    a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
>    b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
>    c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
>       reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
> 
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
> 
> See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
> 
> The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: cgroups: fix ordering of calls in cgroup_attach_proc
> From: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
> 
> awaiting useful changelog...
> 

Here is the patch with a (trial of a) useful changelog. Subject
has been changed as well:

---
>From a9b84e395a0355cd1aa5ee0f525cd682b16dad63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:44:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] cgroups: Don't attach task to subsystem if migration failed

If a task has exited to the point it has called cgroup_exit()
already, then we can't migrate it to another cgroup anymore.

This can happen when we are attaching a task to a new cgroup
between the call to ->can_attach_task() on subsystems and
the migration that is eventually tried in cgroup_task_migrate().

In this case cgroup_task_migrate() returns -ESRCH and we don't
want to attach the task to the subsystems because the attachment
to the new cgroup itself failed.

Fix this by only calling ->attach_task() on the subsystems if
the cgroup migration succeeded.

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Blum <bblum@andrew.cmu.edu>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <paul@paulmenage.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/cgroup.c |   15 +++++++++------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
index 1d2b6ce..84bdace 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
@@ -2135,14 +2135,17 @@ int cgroup_attach_proc(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct task_struct *leader)
 		oldcgrp = task_cgroup_from_root(tsk, root);
 		if (cgrp == oldcgrp)
 			continue;
-		/* attach each task to each subsystem */
-		for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
-			if (ss->attach_task)
-				ss->attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
-		}
 		/* if the thread is PF_EXITING, it can just get skipped. */
 		retval = cgroup_task_migrate(cgrp, oldcgrp, tsk, true);
-		BUG_ON(retval != 0 && retval != -ESRCH);
+		if (retval == 0) {
+			/* attach each task to each subsystem */
+			for_each_subsys(root, ss) {
+				if (ss->attach_task)
+					ss->attach_task(cgrp, tsk);
+			}
+		} else {
+			BUG_ON(retval != -ESRCH);
+		}
 	}
 	/* nothing is sensitive to fork() after this point. */
 
-- 
1.7.5.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-08-26 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <201108252044.p7PKiaHd006997@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-26 15:12 ` + cgroups-fix-ordering-of-calls-in-cgroup_attach_proc.patch added to -mm tree Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-26 15:18   ` Paul Menage
2011-08-26 15:21   ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-26 15:50     ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-26 15:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-08-26 17:01   ` [PATCH v2] cgroups: Don't attach task to subsystem if migration failed Ben Blum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110826153843.GE3298@somewhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bblum@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox