From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc4
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:02:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110830100236.GA17222@gere.osrc.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314695670.2054.6.camel@twins>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:14:30AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 09:07 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 09:52:43PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > We're back on track on weekly -rc releases.
> >
> > Peter,
> >
> > I get the following lockdep splat on -rc4, it looks like load balancing
> > something.
> >
> > [ 5183.478132] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [ 5183.478155] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:690 __lock_acquire+0x189/0x916()
>
> that's:
>
> look_up_lock_class():
> WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name);
>
> That's something that really shouldn't happen and my first guess is that
> you're suffering some memory corruption.
Hmm, strange. That was one of Linus' suggestions last time I triggered
something similar in look_up_lock_class(). (Thanks Yong, I'd completely
forgotten about it). The old issue was a list corruption at the same
spot and this one looks similar except the list element is there to not
trap on the memory access but it triggers on the warning because it is
obviously a different element.
And the fact that I'd completely forgotten about it is that it hasn't
reappeared since then (v2.6.37-rc5-62-g6313e3c) which fits with the
pattern of a memory corruption.
Anyway, this is just FYI in case someone else triggers it too, I'll be
on the lookout for other strange things cooking up while the machine is
running.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 4:52 Linux 3.1-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2011-08-29 5:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-30 7:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-08-30 7:58 ` Yong Zhang
2011-08-30 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-30 10:02 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-29 13:22 Pawel Sikora
2011-08-29 15:39 ` Keith Packard
2011-09-02 4:52 ` Paweł Sikora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110830100236.GA17222@gere.osrc.amd.com \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox