From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@akkadia.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Ehrenberg <dehrenberg@google.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Approaches to making io_submit not block
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:23:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110901162337.GA28802@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110901161531.GB758@samba2>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:15:31AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > We could easily give you an fcntl / dup3 flag to only release posix
> > locks on the final close of a struct file if that helps you.
>
> That would help us enormously - it'd be Linux only of course but
> we could easily add support for that.
>
> Can you propose the design here so we can run it past some of the
> Solaris/FreeBSD folks (it'd be nice if we could get broader adoption) ?
Not sure there is all that much to discuss. The idea is to have locks
that behave like Posix locks, but only get release when the last duped
fd to them gets released.
We'd define a new O_LOCKS_WHATEVER flag for it, which gets set either
using fcntl(..., F_SETFL, ...) or dup3. All in all that should be less
than 50 lines of code in the kernel.
The alternative would be to design a different lock type, but that would
be a lot more invasive, and not provide any real benefits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 17:33 Approaches to making io_submit not block Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-30 21:51 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-31 17:08 ` Andi Kleen
2011-08-31 21:00 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 21:15 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-01 4:18 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 4:39 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-01 6:54 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-02 13:08 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-09-02 13:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 3:39 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 4:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-30 7:02 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <CAAK6Zt0Sh1GdEOb-tNf2FGXJs=e1Jbcqew13R_GdTqrv6vW97w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <x49k49uk2ox.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4E5D5817.6040704@kernel.dk>
2011-08-30 22:19 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 22:32 ` Jens Axboe
2011-08-30 22:41 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-30 22:45 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-30 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-30 23:03 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-08-30 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-31 11:04 ` Ulrich Drepper
2011-08-31 16:59 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 11:14 ` Ulrich Drepper
2011-09-01 15:58 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:15 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-09-01 16:31 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:34 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-09-01 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 16:57 ` Jeremy Allison
2011-08-31 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-31 6:04 ` guy keren
2011-08-31 23:16 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 23:48 ` guy keren
2011-08-31 23:59 ` Daniel Ehrenberg
2011-08-31 15:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2011-08-31 16:02 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110901162337.GA28802@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dehrenberg@google.com \
--cc=drepper@akkadia.org \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=jra@samba.org \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox