Re: Approaches to making io_submit not block

[Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:23:37PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:15:31AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > We could easily give you an fcntl / dup3 flag to only release posix
> > > locks on the final close of a struct file if that helps you.
> > 
> > That would help us enormously - it'd be Linux only of course but
> > we could easily add support for that.
> > 
> > Can you propose the design here so we can run it past some of the
> > Solaris/FreeBSD folks (it'd be nice if we could get broader adoption) ?
> 
> Not sure there is all that much to discuss.  The idea is to have locks
> that behave like Posix locks, but only get release when the last duped
> fd to them gets released.
> 
> We'd define a new O_LOCKS_WHATEVER flag for it, which gets set either
> using fcntl(..., F_SETFL, ...) or dup3.  All in all that should be less
> than 50 lines of code in the kernel.

Ok, so it'd be set at open() time, say:

O_CLOLOCK_PERSIST

(to match the naming of something like O_CLOEXEC) and be available to set
with F_SETFD via an fcntl and dup3 call ?

> The alternative would be to design a different lock type, but that would
> be a lot more invasive, and not provide any real benefits.

No, we don't want that thanks :-).

Jeremy