From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757981Ab1IAUr1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:47:27 -0400 Received: from g1t0026.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.33]:13457 "EHLO g1t0026.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757887Ab1IAUr0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:47:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:44:19 -0500 From: scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com To: Jesse Barnes Cc: Eric Dumazet , Jon Mason , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stephenmcameron@gmail.com, thenzl@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mikem@beardog.cce.hp.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Roland Dreier , James Bottomley , scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com Subject: Re: [BUG] scsi: hpsa: how to destroy your files Message-ID: <20110901204419.GY8422@beardog.cce.hp.com> References: <20110721181605.31672.36250.stgit@beardog.cce.hp.com> <1314890642.2823.27.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <20110901160724.GN9189@beardog.cce.hp.com> <1314898815.2823.33.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <1314903038.3067.27.camel@dabdike> <20110901125938.7cb1da85@jbarnes-desktop> <20110901200349.GO9189@beardog.cce.hp.com> <20110901130930.5caec2d4@jbarnes-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110901130930.5caec2d4@jbarnes-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:09:30PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:03:49 -0500 > scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:59:38PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 11:50:38 -0700 > > > James Bottomley wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 10:58 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > > > > OK I found the bad commit,I got lucky... I lost some files but my > > > > > > machine was able to complete the bisection. CC involved people > > > > > > > > > > > # bad: [b03e7495a862b028294f59fc87286d6d78ee7fa1] PCI: Set PCI-E Max Payload Size on fabric > > > > > > > > > > Hi Eric, > > > > > > > > > > I guess it would be useful to see "lspci -vv" output with a "good" kernel > > > > > and with that bad patch applied. Most likely we should see some difference > > > > > somewhere in the MaxPayload fields in the PCI Express capability of > > > > > some device. > > > > > > > > > > Either the RAID controller or something else lies, and puts a value > > > > > in the DevCap that it can't actually support, or else the patch is > > > > > buggy and puts something out of range in a DevCtl somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > While we investigate, I think the problems produced by the patch (data > > > > corruption) are serious enough to warrant reverting it, please Jesse. > > > > > > Hm I haven't been paying attention to the compromise thread; how should > > > I share these changes? Is master.kernel.org down indefinitely? Is > > > there a new server at kernel.org I can use? > > > > I can't answer that question, but I would like a copy of your revert > > patch(es) to test (as a simple patch --reverse of the original commit on the 3.1-rc4 > > tree didn't go in cleanly). > > Attached is the series. Applies on top of my for-linus branch. Thanks. I tried them out vs. 3.1-rc4, and they applied cleanly and make things work on my BL460g7. -- steve