The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Chew <achew@nvidia.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info.
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:56:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314914676-28397-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>

Stephen,

Can you please fix your e-mail client / system / whatever so that your
patch series are no longer sent duplicated?

On Thu,  1 Sep 2011 16:04:27 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Some devices use a single pin as both an IRQ and a GPIO. In that case,
> irq_gpio is the GPIO ID for that pin. Not all drivers use this feature.
> Where they do, and the use of this feature is optional, and the system
> wishes to disable this feature, this field must be explicitly set to a
> defined invalid GPIO ID, such as -1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v3: Also add the field to i2c_board_info, and copy the field from
>     i2c_board_info to i2c_client upon instantiation

I don't get the idea. The i2c core doesn't make any use of the field,
and that field will only be used by a few drivers amongst the 420+
i2c drivers in the tree. This looks like a waste of memory. What's wrong
with including the new field in the private platform or arch data
structure for drivers which need it?

> 
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c |    1 +
>  include/linux/i2c.h    |    9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 131079a..da12540 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info)
>  	client->flags = info->flags;
>  	client->addr = info->addr;
>  	client->irq = info->irq;
> +	client->irq_gpio = info->irq_gpio;
>  
>  	strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name));
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index 3fad485..49e2e36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ struct i2c_driver {
>   * @driver: device's driver, hence pointer to access routines
>   * @dev: Driver model device node for the slave.
>   * @irq: indicates the IRQ generated by this device (if any)
> + * @irq_gpio: some devices use a single pin as both an IRQ and a GPIO. In
> + *	that case, irq_gpio is the GPIO ID for that pin. Not all drivers
> + *	use this feature. Where they do, and the use of this feature is
> + *	optional, and the system wishes to disable this feature, this
> + *	field must be explicitly set to a defined invalid GPIO ID, such
> + *	as -1.
>   * @detected: member of an i2c_driver.clients list or i2c-core's
>   *	userspace_devices list
>   *
> @@ -209,6 +215,7 @@ struct i2c_client {
>  	struct i2c_driver *driver;	/* and our access routines	*/
>  	struct device dev;		/* the device structure		*/
>  	int irq;			/* irq issued by device		*/
> +	int irq_gpio;			/* gpio corresponding to irq	*/
>  	struct list_head detected;
>  };
>  #define to_i2c_client(d) container_of(d, struct i2c_client, dev)
> @@ -240,6 +247,7 @@ static inline void i2c_set_clientdata(struct i2c_client *dev, void *data)
>   * @archdata: copied into i2c_client.dev.archdata
>   * @of_node: pointer to OpenFirmware device node
>   * @irq: stored in i2c_client.irq
> + * @irq_gpio: stored in i2c_client.irq_gpio
>   *
>   * I2C doesn't actually support hardware probing, although controllers and
>   * devices may be able to use I2C_SMBUS_QUICK to tell whether or not there's
> @@ -260,6 +268,7 @@ struct i2c_board_info {
>  	struct dev_archdata	*archdata;
>  	struct device_node *of_node;
>  	int		irq;
> +	int		irq_gpio;
>  };
>  
>  /**


-- 
Jean Delvare

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-02  6:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 22:04 [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] spi: Add irq_gpio field to struct spi_device, spi_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975 Don't use irq_to_gpio() Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Don't assume 0 is an invalid GPIO Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Fix probe() error-handling Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] spi: Add irq_gpio field to struct spi_device, spi_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975 Don't use irq_to_gpio() Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Don't assume 0 is an invalid GPIO Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Fix probe() error-handling Stephen Warren
2011-09-02  6:56 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-09-02  9:19   ` [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-02  9:24     ` Jean Delvare
2011-09-02 18:24       ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-06 22:57         ` Greg KH
2011-09-19 21:59           ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-20  4:16   ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20  8:54     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare \
    --to=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=achew@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox