From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Chew <achew@nvidia.com>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info.
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:56:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314914676-28397-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
Stephen,
Can you please fix your e-mail client / system / whatever so that your
patch series are no longer sent duplicated?
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 16:04:27 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Some devices use a single pin as both an IRQ and a GPIO. In that case,
> irq_gpio is the GPIO ID for that pin. Not all drivers use this feature.
> Where they do, and the use of this feature is optional, and the system
> wishes to disable this feature, this field must be explicitly set to a
> defined invalid GPIO ID, such as -1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
> ---
> v3: Also add the field to i2c_board_info, and copy the field from
> i2c_board_info to i2c_client upon instantiation
I don't get the idea. The i2c core doesn't make any use of the field,
and that field will only be used by a few drivers amongst the 420+
i2c drivers in the tree. This looks like a waste of memory. What's wrong
with including the new field in the private platform or arch data
structure for drivers which need it?
>
> drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 1 +
> include/linux/i2c.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> index 131079a..da12540 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ i2c_new_device(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_board_info const *info)
> client->flags = info->flags;
> client->addr = info->addr;
> client->irq = info->irq;
> + client->irq_gpio = info->irq_gpio;
>
> strlcpy(client->name, info->type, sizeof(client->name));
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
> index 3fad485..49e2e36 100644
> --- a/include/linux/i2c.h
> +++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
> @@ -192,6 +192,12 @@ struct i2c_driver {
> * @driver: device's driver, hence pointer to access routines
> * @dev: Driver model device node for the slave.
> * @irq: indicates the IRQ generated by this device (if any)
> + * @irq_gpio: some devices use a single pin as both an IRQ and a GPIO. In
> + * that case, irq_gpio is the GPIO ID for that pin. Not all drivers
> + * use this feature. Where they do, and the use of this feature is
> + * optional, and the system wishes to disable this feature, this
> + * field must be explicitly set to a defined invalid GPIO ID, such
> + * as -1.
> * @detected: member of an i2c_driver.clients list or i2c-core's
> * userspace_devices list
> *
> @@ -209,6 +215,7 @@ struct i2c_client {
> struct i2c_driver *driver; /* and our access routines */
> struct device dev; /* the device structure */
> int irq; /* irq issued by device */
> + int irq_gpio; /* gpio corresponding to irq */
> struct list_head detected;
> };
> #define to_i2c_client(d) container_of(d, struct i2c_client, dev)
> @@ -240,6 +247,7 @@ static inline void i2c_set_clientdata(struct i2c_client *dev, void *data)
> * @archdata: copied into i2c_client.dev.archdata
> * @of_node: pointer to OpenFirmware device node
> * @irq: stored in i2c_client.irq
> + * @irq_gpio: stored in i2c_client.irq_gpio
> *
> * I2C doesn't actually support hardware probing, although controllers and
> * devices may be able to use I2C_SMBUS_QUICK to tell whether or not there's
> @@ -260,6 +268,7 @@ struct i2c_board_info {
> struct dev_archdata *archdata;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> int irq;
> + int irq_gpio;
> };
>
> /**
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-02 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 22:04 [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] spi: Add irq_gpio field to struct spi_device, spi_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975 Don't use irq_to_gpio() Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Don't assume 0 is an invalid GPIO Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Fix probe() error-handling Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 2/5] spi: Add irq_gpio field to struct spi_device, spi_board_info Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 3/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975 Don't use irq_to_gpio() Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 4/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Don't assume 0 is an invalid GPIO Stephen Warren
2011-09-01 22:04 ` [PATCH V3 5/5] staging:iio:magnetometer:ak8975: Fix probe() error-handling Stephen Warren
2011-09-02 6:56 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2011-09-02 9:19 ` [PATCH V3 1/5] i2c: Add irq_gpio field to struct i2c_client, i2c_board_info Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-02 9:24 ` Jean Delvare
2011-09-02 18:24 ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-06 22:57 ` Greg KH
2011-09-19 21:59 ` Stephen Warren
2011-09-20 4:16 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 8:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110902085620.4ad918c4@endymion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=achew@nvidia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox