From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: matthltc@us.ibm.com, rjw@sisk.pl, paul@paulmenage.org,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal()
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:46:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110904184626.GA30101@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314988070-12244-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
On 09/03, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> This patch removes set_freezable_with_signal() along with
> PF_FREEZER_NOSIG
Great. I never understood PF_FREEZER_NOSIG logic ;)
One question,
> @@ -72,10 +72,6 @@ bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop)
> schedule();
> }
>
> - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> - recalc_sigpending(); /* We sent fake signal, clean it up */
> - spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> -
Why? This recalc_sigpending() makes sense imho. Otherwise the user-space
tasks (almost) always return with TIF_SIGPENDING. May be we can do this
under "if (PF_KTRHREAD)".
For example. Suppose the user-space task does wait_event_freezable()...
Hmm. OTOH, wait_event_freezable() looks wrong anyway... So probably
this doesn't matter. ptrace_stop/get_signal_to_deliver doesn't need
this, probably we do not care about the other callers.
It seems, a lot of get_signal_to_deliver() calles also call
try_to_freeze() for no reason.
So, yes, I am starting to think this change is fine too ;)
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-04 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-02 18:27 [PATCHSET pm-freezer] freezer: fixes & simplifications Tejun Heo
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] cgroup_freezer: fix freezer->state setting bug in freezer_change_state() Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-04 18:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/6] freezer: set PF_NOFREEZE on a dying task right before TASK_DEAD " Tejun Heo
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 3/6] freezer: restructure __refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 4/6] freezer: use lock_task_sighand() in fake_signal_wake_up() Tejun Heo
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] freezer: remove unused @sig_only from freeze_task() Tejun Heo
2011-09-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 6/6] freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal() Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:46 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2011-09-05 2:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 2:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 16:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-05 16:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-06 3:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-06 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-06 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-06 15:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-07 18:21 ` [PATCH 0/1] freezer: fix wait_event_freezable/__thaw_task races Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-07 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-08 1:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-08 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-11 1:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-11 18:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-11 18:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-08 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] freezer: kill unused set_freezable_with_signal() Matt Helsley
2011-09-11 1:37 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-04 18:48 ` [PATCHSET pm-freezer] freezer: fixes & simplifications Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110904184626.GA30101@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paul@paulmenage.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).