public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regmap bulk read styles.
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:19:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110905151917.GD3889@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E64E16A.6060401@cam.ac.uk>

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:49:14PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> The burst read is pretty much what you have covered by
> regmap_bulk_read. I assume an implementation for spi
> doing

> TX Addr1 XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX
> RX XXXXX Data1 Data2 Data3 Data4 ...

> would be general enough to be worth providing? Any device
> that doesn't understand this should simply not use it.

Yes, that's the assumption the code is making for all buses.

> The second is more interesting.  It actually looks quite like
> your gather write.  We have a set of registers that we need
> to read.  A classic example is that a coherent set will only
> be received (e.g. valid at an instant in time) if we read
> all channels of an accelerometer in one go (between chip selects).

> Would you be in favour of an interface to handle this use case
> or is it better just to bypass regmap for this use case?
> (which would be a pity as it leads to duplication as all the
> configuration stuff fits nicely).

If you can come up with a tasteful interface for doing this I wouldn't
object but my suspicion is that it's going to be easier to reimplement.
It does seem useful, I'm just worried about how the interface would
look.

> As an aside, isn't your gather write more typically described
> as a scatter write?  (writes one coherent set to a number of
> disjoint locations?)

On the write side it's generally a gather (reading from different
locations and writing out a continuous stream) while on the read side
it's generally a scatter (reading a continuous data stream and writing
it to multiple locations).  The gather here refers to getting data from
more than one place and using it to transmit a single byte stream.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-05 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-05 14:49 Regmap bulk read styles Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-05 15:19 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-09-05 15:36   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110905151917.GD3889@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox