From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753792Ab1IETzv (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:55:51 -0400 Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:57210 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753087Ab1IETzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:55:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:55:37 -0700 From: Mark Brown To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix regmap compilation with CONFIG_DEBUGFS=n Message-ID: <20110905195536.GB11107@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1315250978-4242-1-git-send-email-lars@metafoo.de> <20110905194254.GA11107@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4E6528CD.7080003@metafoo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E6528CD.7080003@metafoo.de> X-Cookie: You will wish you hadn't. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 09/05/2011 09:42 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > I sense that this doesn't actually happen in mainline... > Uhm, yes... the patch is still valid though, want me to resubmit it with a > different patch description? Yes please, no problem with the patch itself but the description was obviously bogus (it's fixing a future problem, not a current one).