public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
	Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
	Samuel Oritz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] regmap: Incorporate the regcache core into regmap
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:27:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110906012733.GD31600@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E64F74C.1010606@metafoo.de>

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:22:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 03:51 PM, Dimitris Papastamos wrote:

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_REGCACHE
> > +	if (!map->cache_bypass) {
> > +		ret = regcache_read(map, reg, val);
> > +		if (!ret) {
> > +			mutex_unlock(&map->lock);
> > +			return 0;
> > +		}
> > +	}

> I think this will need tighter integration. For example do we want to fallback
> to a hw read when the cached read fails? And also regcache_read will return for
> REGCACHE_NONE, which means we neither do a cached read nor a hw read.

I think falling through to hardware is sensible - if nothing else we've
got to do that for uncached registers.  Though if we're in cache only
mode we probably don't want to do that as the hardware may be powered
off.  But in general it does make sense to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-05 13:50 [PATCH 0/6 v2] Introduce caching support for regmap Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] regmap: Introduce caching support Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 16:14   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-09-05 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] regmap: Add the indexed cache support Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] regmap: Add the rbtree " Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 16:15   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-09-05 13:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] regmap: Add the LZO " Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 16:18   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-09-15  9:35     ` Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 13:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] regmap: Add the regcache_sync trace event Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 13:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] regmap: Incorporate the regcache core into regmap Dimitris Papastamos
2011-09-05 16:22   ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-09-06  1:27     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-09-06  1:47 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] Introduce caching support for regmap Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110906012733.GD31600@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=dp@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox