From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755390Ab1IFXek (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:34:40 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43097 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755374Ab1IFXec (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 19:34:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:34:29 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Wu Fengguang , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Message-ID: <20110906233429.GD31945@quack.suse.cz> References: <20110904015305.367445271@intel.com> <20110904020915.240747479@intel.com> <1315324030.14232.14.camel@twins> <20110906232738.GC31945@quack.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110906232738.GC31945@quack.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 07-09-11 01:27:38, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 06-09-11 17:47:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 09:53 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > /* > > > + * After a task dirtied this many pages, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() > > > + * will look to see if it needs to start dirty throttling. > > > + * > > > + * If dirty_poll_interval is too low, big NUMA machines will call the expensive > > > + * global_page_state() too often. So scale it near-sqrt to the safety margin > > > + * (the number of pages we may dirty without exceeding the dirty limits). > > > + */ > > > +static unsigned long dirty_poll_interval(unsigned long dirty, > > > + unsigned long thresh) > > > +{ > > > + if (thresh > dirty) > > > + return 1UL << (ilog2(thresh - dirty) >> 1); > > > + > > > + return 1; > > > +} > > > > Where does that sqrt come from? > He does 2^{log_2(x)/2} which, if done in real numbers arithmetics, would > result in x^{1/2}. Given the integer arithmetics, it might be twice as > small but still it's some approximation... Ah, now I realized that you probably meant to ask why does he use sqrt and not some other function... Sorry for the noise. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR