From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
Cc: "Rowand, Frank" <Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:42:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110907064235.GD3610@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E66DCAB.8090801@am.sony.com>
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:53:31PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 08/26/11 16:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 04:58:49PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> >> On 08/13/11 03:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Whee, I can skip release announcements too!
> >>>
> >>> So no the subject ain't no mistake its not, 3.0.1-rt11 is there for the
> >>> grabs.
>
> < snip >
>
> >> I have a consistent (every boot) hang on boot. With a few
> >> hacks to get console output, I get the
> >>
> >> rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
>
> < snip >
>
> >> This is an ARM NaviEngine (out of tree, so I also have applied
> >> a series of pages for platform support).
> >>
> >> CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL is set. Full config is attached.
>
> I have also replicated the problem on the ARM RealView (in tree) and
> without the RT patches.
>
> >
> > Hmmm... The last few that I have seen that looked like this were
> > due to my messing up rcutorture so that the RCU-boost testing kthreads
> > ran CPU-bound at real-time priority.
> >
> > Is it possible that something similar is happening on your system?
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
>
> The problem ended up being caused by the allowed cpus mask being set
> to all possible cpus for the ksoftirqd on the secondary processors.
> So the RCU softirq was never executing on cpu 2.
That would be bad! ;-)
Thank you for tracking this down!
Thanx, Paul
> I'll test the following patch on 3.1 tomorrow.
>
> -Frank Rowand
>
>
> Symptom: rcu stall
>
> The problem was that ksoftirqd was woken on the secondary processors before
> the secondary processors were online. This led to allowed cpus being set
> to all cpus.
>
> wake_up_process()
> try_to_wake_up()
> select_task_rq()
> if (... || !cpu_online(cpu))
> select_fallback_rq(task_cpu(p), p)
> ...
> /* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
> dest_cpu = cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(p)
> do_set_cpus_allowed(p, cpu_possible_mask)
> # Thus ksoftirqd can now run on any cpu...
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
> ---
> kernel/softirq.c | 19 14 + 5 - 0 !
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: b/kernel/softirq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(irq_stat);
> static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd);
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd_pending_online);
>
> char *softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {
> "HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL",
> @@ -862,28 +863,36 @@ static int __cpuinit cpu_callback(struct
> return notifier_from_errno(PTR_ERR(p));
> }
> kthread_bind(p, hotcpu);
> - per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = p;
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = p;
> break;
> case CPU_ONLINE:
> case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) =
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
> wake_up_process(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu));
> break;
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
> case CPU_UP_CANCELED_FROZEN:
> - if (!per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu))
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> break;
> /* Unbind so it can run. Fall thru. */
> - kthread_bind(per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu),
> - cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
> + kthread_bind(p, cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask));
> case CPU_DEAD:
> case CPU_DEAD_FROZEN: {
> static const struct sched_param param = {
> .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1
> };
>
> - p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu);
> + if (!p)
> + p = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu);
> per_cpu(ksoftirqd, hotcpu) = NULL;
> + per_cpu(ksoftirqd_pending_online, hotcpu) = NULL;
> sched_setscheduler_nocheck(p, SCHED_FIFO, ¶m);
> kthread_stop(p);
> takeover_tasklets(hotcpu);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-13 10:53 [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11 Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 11:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-13 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 13:59 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-13 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-13 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-14 4:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-16 14:17 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-16 15:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-16 15:18 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-16 19:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-17 4:28 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-17 5:03 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2011-08-15 10:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-14 21:19 ` Clark Williams
2011-08-23 14:12 ` [patch] sched, rt: fix migrate_enable() thinko Mike Galbraith
2011-09-08 2:11 ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-08 4:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-08-24 23:58 ` [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11 Frank Rowand
2011-08-26 23:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-29 19:57 ` Frank Rowand
2011-08-30 3:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-07 2:53 ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-07 3:00 ` Frank Rowand
2011-09-07 6:42 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-09-07 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 10:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 10:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 14:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-07 16:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-07 16:33 ` Frank Rowand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110907064235.GD3610@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Frank_Rowand@sonyusa.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).