From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756430Ab1IGQTe (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:19:34 -0400 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:56233 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756358Ab1IGQT3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:19:29 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,344,1312182000"; d="scan'208";a="46332127" Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:00:22 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Message-ID: <20110907110022.GA6012@localhost> References: <20110904015305.367445271@intel.com> <20110904020915.240747479@intel.com> <1315324030.14232.14.camel@twins> <20110907010448.GA6513@localhost> <1315380716.11101.5.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1315380716.11101.5.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 03:31:56PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 09:04 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > So the sqrt naturally leads to less overheads and more N tolerance for > > large memory servers, which have large (thresh-freerun) gaps. > > Thanks, and as you say its an initial guess, later refined using patch > 14. Yes, exactly.