linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dvlasenk@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 00:55:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109080055.52232.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109072340.31460.vda.linux@googlemail.com>

On Wednesday 07 September 2011 22:40:31, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter

(I wonder if it'd be a good idea to be more future proof and pass in
a pointer to a `struct { int my_size; int options; }', so we can
add more things in the future other than option bits, if we need to.)

> This can be used to close a few corner cases in strace where we get
> unwanted racy behavior after attach, but before we have a chance
> to set options (the notorious post-execve SIGTRAP comes to mind),

(irrespective of the patch being a good idea or not)

>From previous discussions, I understood that PTRACE_SEIZE _always_ disables
the post-execve SIGTRAP, so I don't believe that race actually exists.
Or is that not the case?

-- 
Pedro Alves

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08  5:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-07 21:40 [PATCH v2] Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter Denys Vlasenko
2011-09-07 23:55 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2011-09-08  0:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-08 18:17   ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-11  2:05     ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-11 18:14       ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-09-13  8:00         ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201109080055.52232.pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).