linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regmap: Support half writes and padding between register and value.
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:27:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110908162715.GB3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1315490964-25718-2-git-send-email-jic23@cam.ac.uk>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:09:23PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

> Note half writes currently assume address numbers are even only.
> That's a pain for caching so other suggestions welcome.  I could set
> it as a 7 bit address and increase the padding to 9 bits.  That makes
> the write bit a little strange though as it will be going into the
> padding.

This needs more documentation somewhere explaining what a half write is
and/or a better name for half write but doesn't look too invasive so I
think this approach can work.  If we come up with something better later
then we can always change things, there shouldn't be too many users to
update if that happens.

> -	map->format.reg_bytes = config->reg_bits / 8;
> +	map->format.buf_size = (config->reg_bits +
> +				config->reg_pad_bits +
> +				config->val_bits) / 8;
> +	map->format.reg_bytes = (config->reg_bits + config->reg_pad_bits)/ 8;

Please do a patch adding padding separately - that does seem like a
useful thing to have in general, with the option of having it both
before and after the register.

> -	if (val == map->work_buf + map->format.reg_bytes)
> -		ret = map->bus->write(map->dev, map->work_buf,
> -				      map->format.reg_bytes + val_len);
> -	else if (map->bus->gather_write)
> +	if (val == map->work_buf + map->format.reg_bytes) {
> +		if (map->format.half_write) {
> +			ret = map->bus->write(map->dev, map->work_buf,
> +					      (map->format.reg_bytes +
> +					       val_len) >> 1);
> +			if (ret >= 0)
> +				ret = map->bus->write(map->dev,
> +						      map->work_buf +
> +						      ((map->format.reg_bytes +
> +							val_len) >> 1),
> +						      (map->format.reg_bytes +
> +						       val_len) >> 1);
> +		} else {
> +			ret = map->bus->write(map->dev, map->work_buf,
> +					      map->format.reg_bytes + val_len);
> +		}

This code is getting very complicated...  I think it'd be clearer to
have a special case at the head of the function that does the half write
stuff.  It also feels like the half bit needs parameterisation, but I
can't immediately think of how to do that sensibly.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-08 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-08 14:09 [RFC PATCH 0/2 V2] Using regmap with ADIS devices Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-08 14:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] regmap: Support half writes and padding between register and value Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-08 16:27   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-09-09  9:44     ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-09 16:14       ` Mark Brown
2011-09-09 16:30         ` Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-09 16:30           ` Mark Brown
2011-09-08 14:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging:iio:imu:adis16400 regmap introduction Jonathan Cameron
2011-09-08 16:30   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110908162715.GB3098@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).