From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759343Ab1IIQEI (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:04:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64890 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759080Ab1IIQEF (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:04:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:00:48 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Denys Vlasenko Cc: Tejun Heo , Denys Vlasenko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Why I want PTRACE_O_TRACESTOP option Message-ID: <20110909160048.GA23271@redhat.com> References: <1315500802.18043.45.camel@dhcp-25-63.brq.redhat.com> <20110909001853.GA29319@htj.dyndns.org> <201109090745.35040.vda.linux@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201109090745.35040.vda.linux@googlemail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/09, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > How about changing PTRACE_EVENT_STOP value to, say, 255 then, > in order to move it away from (option,event) area? Probably makes sense. Oleg.