From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759883Ab1IJT60 (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:58:26 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:59532 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751948Ab1IJT6Z (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:58:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:58:20 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Christian Hoffmann Cc: Josh Boyer , LKML Subject: Re: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002 Message-ID: <20110910195820.GC4118@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <4E6B6624.1000406@christianhoffmann.info> <4E6B9BC1.4060000@christianhoffmann.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E6B9BC1.4060000@christianhoffmann.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) x-cbid: 11091019-6078-0000-0000-00000093EC1D Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:17:53PM +0200, Christian Hoffmann wrote: > On 09/10/2011 06:44 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Christian Hoffmann > > wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I can see the following bug report in the kernel 3.1 rc5 dmesg: > >> > >>[ 0.000008] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002 > >>[ 0.000012] Modules linked in: > >>[ 0.000015] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.1.0-rc5-ch+ #2 > >>[ 0.000017] Call Trace: > >>[ 0.000024] [] __schedule_bug+0x66/0x70 > >>[ 0.000028] [] schedule+0x99d/0x9b0 > >>[ 0.000032] [] ? pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf > >>[ 0.000035] [] __cond_resched+0x2a/0x40 > >>[ 0.000038] [] _cond_resched+0x31/0x40 > >>[ 0.000041] [] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x53/0x160 > >>[ 0.000043] [] pidmap_init+0x9f/0xdf > >>[ 0.000046] [] start_kernel+0x333/0x3c8 > >>[ 0.000049] [] x86_64_start_reservations+0x132/0x136 > >>[ 0.000051] [] x86_64_start_kernel+0x101/0x110 > > > >Paul McKenney has a patch that solves this oops. You can find it here: > > > >http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537669921538&w=2 > > > >We had discussed getting this into 3.1, but apparently that didn't > >happen (yet?). I thought it had been sent upstream with my tested-by, > >but I don't see it included in Linus' tree. > > Hi, > > the patch up there doesn't seem to apply cleanly to 3.1 rc5, as it > misses the rename done in "[PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/55] rcu: Simplify > quiescent-state accounting" > (http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131537654621392&w=2). For 3.1-rc5, you will be wanting this one: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/19/355 Thanx, Paul