From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755433Ab1ILLdf (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:33:35 -0400 Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:34505 "EHLO out4.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755338Ab1ILLdd (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:33:33 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 44jtOXeeCa1bV0fohzhiQ9p1zYdDD99OhiBOdEEeYf1H 1315827212 Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 13:33:08 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Markus Rechberger Cc: Oliver Neukum , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Increase usbfs bulk buffer size Message-ID: <20110912113308.GA32396@kroah.com> References: <201108171914.52257.oliver@neukum.org> <201108190823.06638.oliver@neukum.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:18:02PM +0200, Markus Rechberger wrote: > Hi, > > I'm a little bit curious why you guys are just ignoring this. Because you seem to be ignoring the fact that changing this can cause problems on systems. And because it really doesn't solve any problems, you are only pushing the processing to the kernel, when it can be done in userspace just as easily. greg k-h