[PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[djwong]

For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo to
something more apropos given the version number.  As the patch is quite large,
I'm only inlining the changelog. 8)

See http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.patch for too-large-for-lkml patch,
http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.png  for a PNG logo, or
http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo-screen.png for a screenshot.

Singed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@djwong.org>
---

 drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.ppm |39322 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 37720 insertions(+), 1602 deletions(-)

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:55,  <djwong@djwong.org> wrote:
> For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo to
> something more apropos given the version number.  As the patch is quite large,
> I'm only inlining the changelog. 8)
>
> See http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.patch for too-large-for-lkml patch,
> http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.png  for a PNG logo, or

Nice try!

> http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo-screen.png for a screenshot.

How come the text is corrupting the logo during scrolling?

> Singed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@djwong.org>
> ---
>
>  drivers/video/logo/logo_linux_clut224.ppm |39322 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 37720 insertions(+), 1602 deletions(-)

This really needs to go through linux-fbdev (CCed).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[Lin Ming]

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM,  <djwong@djwong.org> wrote:
> For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo to
> something more apropos given the version number.  As the patch is quite large,
> I'm only inlining the changelog. 8)
>
> See http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.patch for too-large-for-lkml patch,
> http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.png  for a PNG logo, or

Funny, does it look like Win98's logo?

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[Gene Heskett]

On Saturday, September 10, 2011, Lin Ming wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM,  <djwong@djwong.org> wrote:
>> For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo
>> to something more apropos given the version number.  As the patch is
>> quite large, I'm only inlining the changelog. 8)
>> 
>> See http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.patch for too-large-for-lkml
>> patch, http://djwong.org/docs/31-tuxlogo.png  for a PNG logo, or
>
>Funny, does it look like Win98's logo?

Yes, entirely too much of an imitation.  I will not contaminate my Linux 
install with it.

Cheers, gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://204.111.66.235:85/gene/>
"The human brain is like an enormous fish -- it is flat and slimy and
has gills through which it can see."
		-- Monty Python

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 423 bytes --]

On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 01:55:47 PDT, djwong@djwong.org said:
> For Linux 3.1, I thought we could change the 224-color framebuffer logo to
> something more apropos given the version number.  As the patch is quite large,
> I'm only inlining the changelog. 8)

You're welcome to provide a screenshot on a 32-core or 64-core system. :)

(Now, if you had  a nice 24-bit-deep color Tux around the same size as the current one.. ;)


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[markus reichelt]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 376 bytes --]

* Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> (Now, if you had  a nice 24-bit-deep color Tux around the same size
> as the current one..  ;)

well.. same size it is:

http://mareichelt.de/temp/logo_linux_clut224.ppm

( btw, the version mentioned at [1] is still in old/ )


[1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/12/20/4390856
-- 
left blank, right bald

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] logo: Change regular 224-color tux logo to something more appropriate for Linux 3.1

[Valdis.Kletnieks]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 566 bytes --]

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:06:19 +0200, markus reichelt said:
> * Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> 
> > (Now, if you had  a nice 24-bit-deep color Tux around the same size
> > as the current one..  ;)
> 
> well.. same size it is:
> 
> http://mareichelt.de/temp/logo_linux_clut224.ppm

If you're going to make it 24-bit color, *use* it for something :)

Our local Linux user's group logo:

http://vtluug.org/static/images/logo.png

Yes, it's maroon and orange. That's because this is the school mascot:

http://a2.twimg.com/profile_images/116745751/hokie-bird_normal.gif

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]