From: Russell King <rmk+alsa@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>, Harald Welte <laforge@openezx.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Subject: Re: [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973_wm8753.c build failure
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:16:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110915191630.GA21615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110915133122.GG7988@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 02:31:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:00:56PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > If it's not dead then it needs sorting out. Either way there's two
> > valid states: 1. fully merged, or 2. none of it is merged.
> > There's no real half-way house state - certainly not one which should
> > persist for three years. (It would be reasonable for maybe a couple
> > of kernel releases but more than that is becoming very much a joke.)
>
> I'm not really aware of what's going on with the arch/arm code but from
> an ASoC point of view it's one of the platforms people seem to usefully
> care about; there's more traffic than for most machines. Obviously the
> problems with s3c24xx aren't going to have been helpful either.
It sounds like you're in the perfect place to send them a warning
that something needs to happen on this, one way or the other.
Whether anyone volunteers should be used as a factor in deciding
how to deal with the small bits of GTA01 support in mainline.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-14 9:18 [linux-next] ASoC: sound/soc/samsung/neo1973_wm8753.c build failure Axel Lin
2011-09-14 19:19 ` Russell King
2011-09-14 23:28 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-14 23:38 ` Russell King
2011-09-15 9:46 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-15 11:00 ` Russell King
2011-09-15 11:53 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2011-09-15 12:06 ` Russell King
2011-09-16 17:02 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-16 20:03 ` Russell King
2011-09-15 13:31 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-15 19:16 ` Russell King [this message]
2011-09-15 22:39 ` Mark Brown
2011-09-15 7:20 ` Harald Welte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110915191630.GA21615@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+alsa@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=laforge@openezx.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrg@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox