From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755808Ab1IPVsZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:48:25 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:41311 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753805Ab1IPVsY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Sep 2011 17:48:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:48:20 -0500 From: Jonathan Nieder To: trouble daemon Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aystarik@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, 586494@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Dell PowerEdge 4200 scsi, worked in 2.6.18, not in 2.6.26 Message-ID: <20110916214820.GJ4683@elie> References: <20110912065618.GA23340@elie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+46 (b01d63af6fea) (2011-07-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org trouble daemon wrote: > As for later kernels, I have no idea tbh. Currently they seem to run > flawless with noapic, so that is what I use when installing and > running them. I do know that the Debian Squeeze installer chokes if I > don't use noapic, however. > > If you are interested in some closure, I suppose I could take a shot > at installing something a little more recent and see if I can get away > with removing noapic though. Just let me know what kernel source > (vanilla/deb sid/etc), version, or any particular .config options that > you would like me to test, and I can see about pasting the console > terminal output when running without noapic disabled. Thanks! Really, anything 3.0 or later would be interesting (mainline is better than distro-patched), with a .config that panics in an older version. Testing with a stock Debian squeeze kernel would be interesting, too.