public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] memcg: Disable preemption in memcg_check_events()
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:20:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110919212641.015320989@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110919212040.745370781@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0003-memcg-Disable-preemption-in-memcg_check_events.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1431 bytes --]

From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>

The code in memcg_check_events() calls this_cpu_read() on
different variables without disabling preemption, and can cause
the calculations to be done from two different CPU variables.

Disable preemption throughout the check to keep apples and oranges
from becoming a mixed drink.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 3508777..a164c93 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int target)
  */
 static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
 {
+	preempt_disable();
 	/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
 	if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(mem, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
 		mem_cgroup_threshold(mem);
@@ -737,6 +738,7 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *mem, struct page *page)
 		}
 #endif
 	}
+	preempt_enable();
 }
 
 static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_cont(struct cgroup *cont)
-- 
1.7.5.4



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-19 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-19 21:20 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Introduce checks for preemptable code for this_cpu_read/write() Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] x86: Remove const_udelay() caring about which cpu var it uses Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:51   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-19 23:31     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] mm: Switch mod_state() to __this_cpu_read() Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 22:02   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-19 23:48     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 14:46       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:16         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 15:54           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 16:07             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 22:19             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-20 13:49     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20 14:01       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 14:51       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:11         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 15:59           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 16:03             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 16:07               ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:27         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20 16:02           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 16:51             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20 17:08               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:20 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-09-20 14:20   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] memcg: Disable preemption in memcg_check_events() Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 14:24     ` Johannes Weiner
2011-09-20 14:33       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-24  0:46   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] printk: Have wake_up_klogd() use __this_cpu_write() Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-19 23:33     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 14:54       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 14:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-19 21:20 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] percpu: Add preempt checks back into this_cpu_read/write() Steven Rostedt
2011-09-19 21:49 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Introduce checks for preemptable code for this_cpu_read/write() Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20  3:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 12:44     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-20 13:51       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20 14:58         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:17           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 14:57       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:19         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 16:08           ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 16:31             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 16:56               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 17:09                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 17:15                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 17:25                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 18:03                       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 18:12                         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 18:27                           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 18:34                             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 22:32             ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-20 22:17           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-09-21  1:33             ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 15:46     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-09-20 16:00       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 16:10         ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 16:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 18:54           ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-21 15:16             ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-21 15:31               ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-21 15:59                 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-21 16:12                   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-21 16:32               ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20  2:20 ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-20  3:12   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20  3:17     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20  8:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-20 12:10       ` Steven Rostedt
2011-09-20 15:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-20 15:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-20 16:05           ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110919212641.015320989@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox