From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751155Ab1ITNef (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:34:35 -0400 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:37907 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781Ab1ITNee (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:34:34 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:34:01 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Steven Rostedt , Linux-mm , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , Jonathan Corbet , Masami Hiramatsu , Hugh Dickins , Christoph Hellwig , Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Thomas Gleixner , Andi Kleen , Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , Jim Keniston , Roland McGrath , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 0/26] Uprobes patchset with perf probe support Message-ID: <20110920133401.GA28550@infradead.org> References: <20110920115938.25326.93059.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110920115938.25326.93059.sendpatchset@srdronam.in.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 05:29:38PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > - Uses i_mutex instead of uprobes_mutex. What for exactly? I'm pretty strict against introducing even more uses for i_mutex, it's already way to overloaded with different meanings.