From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752107Ab1ITPoK (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:44:10 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31692 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751295Ab1ITPoJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 11:44:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:40:15 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Andrew Morton , David Howells , "Serge E. Hallyn" , lkml , richard@nod.at, "Eric W. Biederman" , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] creds: kill __task_cred()->task_is_dead() check Message-ID: <20110920154015.GB17731@redhat.com> References: <20110919214531.GA18085@sergelap> <20110920122202.GA26504@redhat.com> <20110920124419.GA10759@hallyn.com> <20110920134108.GA30749@redhat.com> <20110920143920.GA15859@redhat.com> <20110920143942.GB15859@redhat.com> <20110920152816.GD2380@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110920152816.GD2380@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/20, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:39:42PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > --- 3.1/include/linux/cred.h~1_kill_task_is_dead 2011-09-20 16:28:22.000000000 +0200 > > +++ 3.1/include/linux/cred.h 2011-09-20 16:28:47.000000000 +0200 > > @@ -284,8 +284,7 @@ static inline void put_cred(const struct > > #define __task_cred(task) \ > > ({ \ > > const struct task_struct *__t = (task); \ > > - rcu_dereference_check(__t->real_cred, \ > > - task_is_dead(__t)); \ > > + rcu_dereference_check(__t->real_cred, 0); \ > > The "0" above will make lockdep-RCU complain unconditionally. My guess > is that you want rcu_dereference_raw(). Hmm. I hope you are wrong this time ;) rcu_dereference_check() checks rcu_read_lock_held(). IOW, with this change __task_cred() always requires rcu_read_lock(), and this is what the patch wants. The next one adds " || (task == current" to the rcu_read_lock_held() check above. Oleg.